General performance of SEA incorporating different local structure diversities
|
subset |
measures |
CE |
SEA_true |
SEA_c30 |
SEA_c10 |
SEA_c5 |
SEA_1d |
BLAST |
ALIGN |
FFAS |
|
Family (409 pairs) |
average-shift
|
|
0.61 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.54 |
0.49 |
0.44 |
0.48 |
0.49 |
|
shift>0.9 |
|
73 |
69 |
63 |
56 |
47 |
51 |
60 |
43 |
|
|
shift>0.7 |
|
207 |
199 |
192 |
183 |
152 |
146 |
165 |
161 |
|
|
shift>0.5 |
|
282 |
260 |
259 |
251 |
215 |
197 |
228 |
227 |
|
|
RMSD£3.0
|
257 |
95 |
82 |
82 |
76 |
63 |
77 |
54 |
40 |
|
|
RMSD£5.0 |
397 |
237 |
184 |
171 |
177 |
147 |
157 |
138 |
118 |
|
|
RMSD£8.0 |
408 |
294 |
248 |
249 |
249 |
231 |
196 |
206 |
194 |
|
|
all |
409 |
345 |
404 |
398 |
368 |
366 |
232 |
372 |
409 |
|
|
Superfamily (225 pairs) |
average-shift
|
|
0.27 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
|
shift>0.9 |
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
shift>0.7 |
|
17 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
4 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
|
|
shift>0.5 |
|
54 |
26 |
23 |
21 |
17 |
18 |
18 |
17 |
|
|
RMSD£3.0
|
55 |
12 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
RMSD£5.0 |
160 |
44 |
16 |
18 |
18 |
11 |
18 |
11 |
1 |
|
|
RMSD£8.0 |
163 |
69 |
37 |
34 |
41 |
28 |
23 |
22 |
15 |
|
|
all |
166 |
128 |
217 |
204 |
181 |
177 |
41 |
149 |
225 |
Two subsets of the benchmark (family-level subset and superfamily-level subset) are compared with SEA_c30, SEA_c10, SEA_c5, SEA_true, SEA_1d, and other programs: CE (structural alignment), BLAST, ALIGN and FFAS (profile-profile alignment). The alignment quality is evaluated by the shift score and RMSD. The average-shift row lists the shift score averaged over all the alignments of the each subset by different programs. The number of alignments with shift score > 0.9, > 0.7 and > 0.5, RMSD £ 3.0, £ 5.0 and £ 8.0 in each subset are also listed in rows. The counting according to RMSD requires the length of the alignment is no short than half of its corresponding structural alignment. The all row lists the number of alignments with alignment length no short than half of the structural alignments in each subset. As the structural alignments from CE are used as reference alignments for shift score calculation, its evaluation by shift score is meaningless and the corresponding numbers are blanked out.